Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Welcome to the China Property Forum, a finance and economics discussion forum focused on Chinese and global housing markets. Please register here or log in below.

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
comments remind me of art history professors’
Topic Started: 2 Dec 2015, 11:25 AM (73 Views)
engeles22
No Avatar

http://www.outlettbdress.com/wedding-tiaras_41_1.html , or fabricated story.Fred Perry, Surrey, B.billRe: Oliver’s Budget-Bill Craftiness, Michael Den Tandt, April 10.Finance Minister Joe Oliver proposes introducing legislation to commit this and future governments to balanced budgets, except in times of strictly defined emergencies (one can readily imagine how strict that definition will deteriorate over the years).Presuming this is desirable, would it also be a good idea to treat the Canadian debt as a mortgage and pay it off over the next 25 years?To show how easy (or difficult!this would be, what would the arithmetic of this look like?To be unrealistically simple, let’s assume constant dollars and a zero per cent interest mortgage (Wouldn’t we all love one!to be even more unrealistic.a year per Canadian, with the above assumptions.It would be easy enough to build a more realistic model, which would easily double this amount.for our children and grandchildren?Mike Spence, Victoria.Protection costsRe: Time To Assert Our Power, John Ivison, April 9.The primary beneficiary from the dismantling of our supply management system has always been the consumer, and more specifically the low-income consumer.However, as study after study has shown, dairy farmers in countries where the supply management system has been phased out, also saw a significant benefit, in the rise of their overall profitability.Confusing is just but one word of many to describe the stance of the Dairy Farmers of Canada, which insists on maintaining a system that actually keeps average dairy farmers from actually increasing their profitability.There is no confusion, however, behind the motives of all our politicians http://www.outlettbdress.com/wedding-veils_40_1.html , who put their own narrow electoral motives ahead of trade deals that would benefit every Canadian, including the protected dairy industry.Jeff Spooner, Kinburn, Ont.This article suggests that it’s impossible to sign a significant international trade agreement while maintaining supply management.History proves otherwise.The government of Canada has successfully negotiated 12 trade agreements with 43 countries since 1994 and all of these have opened new markets, improved trade rules, and preserved supply management.This is a successful negotiating formula that can be replicated in the Trans-Pacific Partnership.It works because Canada is already the sixth-largest importer of agri-food products and first on a per capita basis; we don’t need to take any lessons on market access from other countries, even in supply management.Take chicken production for example.Canada is the 15th-largest importer of chicken in the world.We are also the third most valuable market for U.chicken exports and import more chicken than six of the other 11 TPP countries (including the U.We stand behind the market access we provide and are proud of the great value we provide Canadian consumers.Historically, the government of Canada has successfully concluded many bilateral and regional trade agreements that preserve supply management, and we are confident that they will be able to do it again at the TPP.Mike Dungate, executive director, Chicken Farmers of Canada, Toronto.Should private businesses be forced to serve customers they don’t want to?Re: Fashion Royalty, April 4.Margaret Atwood’s criticism of the Duchess of Cambridge’s unfashionable style is unwarranted.There are no stark differences in the impeccable dress styles between the late Princess Diana and the Duchess of Cambridge.Atwood’s comments remind me of art history professors’ lectures making observational comparisons of motifs which were stretched just to make a point.explains my feeling of being offended back in 1981 upon signing her book, Bodily Harm, (ironically, a book intertwined with a fashion theme) when I was a University of Toronto student.no smile or thank you.which was further from the truth.No doubt, fashionable styles pass but memorable feelings do not.Smadar Meiri, Thornhill, Ont.Duffian insightsRe: The Trial During Which All Becomes Clear, Andrew Coyne, April 7.Guilty or not of the charges against him, and whether he’s proven a political pawn or a public-purse predator http://www.outlettbdress.com/wedding-accessories_6_1.html , Mike Duffy is about to give the country a shocking glimpse behind the velvet curtain that separates the hidden workings of high office from those who unknowingly fund its arcane employment practices.The country is about to get that deserving insight not from Duff, the informed inside-Ottawa reporter, but from a perturbed, often petulant (and possibly convicted) Canadian senator.The jury is still out on whether his journey up Parliament Hill will be judged more slippery than the trip down.Why didn’t Mike Duffy just go get a loan at Money Mart?It would have saved everybody a lot of trouble.Terry Toll, Campbell s Bay, Que.False budgetingRe: Ottawa Sells Remaining Stake In GM, April 7.Selling the government’s General Motors shares is a bogus way to balance the budget.It is like selling the family silverware to pay the mortgage.It is a one-time deal and will create only an illusion of solvency.In the long term, next year for instance, the deficit will be back to haunt the government.However, it won’t care since by then the election will have happened.Carbon scamRe: Leave Carbon Pricing To The Provinces, Glen Hodgson, April 7.A tax on carbon will achieve the same results as a tax on hassium or any other of the 118 elements in the peroidic table with respect to climate control, viz.To claim that it will be a benefit is a scam, a means of generating tax under false pretenses.A pox on those who implement the tax.Douglas Stallard, New Glasgow, N.We don’t need another tax and that is just what this carbon scam is going to be.The idea that it will fight climate change is ludicrous, it will just line government coffers.In reality, the global movement on climate change is still being perpetuated by the same bunch of doomsayers, and their biggest worry is that ordinary folks are starting to wise up to this money-making charade that will go down as the biggest hoax e.
Offline View Profile "REPLY" Go to top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · China Real Estate Property Forum ( 中国房地产论坛 ) · Next Topic »
Add Reply



The China Property Forum is an economics and finance forum dedicated to discussion of Chinese and global real estate markets, including China house prices, global house prices, housing affordability, and the likelihood of a global house price crash or China house price crash. Is there a Chinese housing bubble? Will house prices crash, boom or stagnate? Is it better to buy using a home loan, or rent and save the difference? How might a credit crunch or peak debt environment impact Chinese property prices? Is the Chinese property market a pyramid scheme or Ponzi scheme? Can house prices rise forever as people bet on future gains, refinance their mortgage and borrow against equity, or can we find a more sustainable long term approach to managing the Chinese housing market? These are the type of questions we hope to address here, at the China Property Forum, the premier real estate site for property bears, bulls, investors, and speculators! Whether you're a Property Investor, First Home Buyer (FHB) or you're a happily renting tenant, this forum has something for everyone. The forum includes a blog feature, so members may create their own property blog.

China Property Forum complies with ASIC Regulatory Guide 162 regarding Internet Discussion Sites. China Property Forum is not a provider of financial advice. China Property Forum does not in any way endorse the views and opinions of its members, nor does it vouch for for the accuracy or authenticity of their posts. Posts on China Property Forum may contain links to other websites operated by third parties. These websites are not under the control of China Property Forum and CPF management is not responsible for their content.

It is not permitted for any China Property Forum member to post in the role of a licensed financial advisor or to post as the representative of a financial advisor. China Property Forum members are solely responsible for the accuracy and authenticity of their posts, including any alterations made to posts. It is not permitted for China Property Forum members to ask for or offer specific buy, sell or hold recommendations on particular stocks, as a response to a request of this nature may be considered the provision of financial advice.

Views expressed on this forum are not representative of the forum owners. The forum owners are not liable or responsible for comments posted. Information posted does not constitute financial or legal advice. The forum owners accept no liability for information posted, nor for consequences of actions taken on the basis of that information. By visiting or using this forum, members and guests agree to be bound by the Zetaboards Terms of Use.

This site may contain copyright material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such content is posted to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democratic, scientific, and social justice issues. This constitutes 'fair use' of such copyright material as provided for in section 107 of US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit for research and educational purposes only. If you wish to use this material for purposes that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Such material is credited to the true owner or licensee. We will remove from the forum any such material upon the request of the owners of the copyright of said material, as we claim no credit for such material.

For more information go to Limitations on Exclusive Rights: Fair Use

Privacy Policy: China Property Forum uses third party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our site. These third party advertising companies may collect and use information about your visits to China Property Forum as well as other web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here: Google Advertising Privacy FAQ

China Property Forum is hosted by Zetaboards. Please refer also to the Zetaboards Privacy Policy